POV
Swap
by Kim Ripley
You've researched. You've
interviewed. You've got a list of sources a mile long,
and enough anecdotes to fill a multi-volume anthology.
The piece starts to flow as you work it together--an
historical account of a couple's home, and the architectural
innovations that bring it up to speed with modern
living. The story will not only highlight progress
and modernization, it will glimpse the culturally
rich lives of the fascinating homeowners, too. Art
is featured, as are artists and display methods. Worldwide
travels tell their own tales within this piece, with
souvenirs throughout the home. It will undoubtedly
be a writer's masterpiece when completed. And then
you get THE CALL.
"We've got a little
problem," the editor says. And that's okay. "Little
problems" are a big part of freelance writing,
and the professional writer solves those problems
quickly and efficiently. This little problem, however,
turns out to be rather large.
It seems Joe and Mary
Blow (not the homeowner's REAL names) have decided
that their privacy is in peril with any mention of
the location of their home. They also feel their privacy
will be forfeited pending the divulging of their professions
or stories of their art collections. And last but
not least, they have opted for the publication to
withhold use of their real names.
How to proceed?
"I don't think we
can go with pseudonyms--especially not Joe and Mary
Blow," the editor tells the freelancer. "I
think you'll need to re-work the piece, perhaps using
an entirely different point of view---by Friday."
Huh?
This is when deep breathing
techniques are helpful. Following that last exhale,
it's time to take a course of action--and take it
rather quickly. Where this article is concerned, there
will be many obvious changes--starting with POV.
POV--or point of view
has saved many a writer from disasters just like this
aforementioned dilemma. The freelancer must first
rework the article from a different point of view.
In this case, the most logical place to turn was to
the architectural designer and builder involved with
the home's reonovations.
Many phone calls and interviews
later, the freelancer sits down to tear apart the
original masterpiece. Can anything be salvaged from
the content written about the homeowners? Certainly.
Quotes can be turned into simple text provided they
aren't too specific. Some of the homeowner's statements
actually helped create pointed questions for the architect
and builder. In other words, the entire first article
wasn't a waste.
Articles like this are
never a waste. A worst-case scenario finds the piece
filed for future use or reference. The best finds
it reworked and refreshed with a very different point
of view. This article--rather than the homeowner's
description of preserving the history of their home,
became the designer and builder describing the importance
of preserving it, while describing the challenges
and solutions to updating and maintaining the home.
The result was certainly a challenge to the writer,
but a successful one.
Try the following exercise:
Read a short magazine
article. Any publication will do. Now rewrite that
same article, based on a different point of view.
For example, an article about a woman suffering from
panic attacks may take on a new slant when written
from her husband's perspective. What about her doctor?
That could shed a completely new light on the subject.
Use your imagination and practice changing the POV
in your writing. Then when you're caught off guard
by an editor requesting some changes to your article,
you'll be experienced in yet one more facet of writing,
and ready to do the job effectively.
Copyright 2003 Kim Ripley. All Rights Reserved.
Return
to Article Listing